Login to Use StampAuctionNetwork. New Member? Click "Register".
StampAuctionNetwork Extended Features
StampAuctionNetwork Channels
Extended Features
Visit the following Auction Calendars:
Help:
More Useful Information:
Newsletter:
For Auction Firms:
Search for comparables at SiegelAuctions.com
FINE-VERY FINE. A VERY RARE BLOCK OF THE 2-CENT POST OFFICE SPECIAL PRINTING, SHOWING MOST OF THE IMPRINT AT TOP.
Scott Retail as block of four and two singles with no premium for the better position. (Image)
VERY FINE AND CHOICE. AN OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE OF THE RARE INVERTED "SPECIMEN" OVERPRINT ON THE ONE-CENT POST OFFICE SPECIAL PRINTING. THIS IS THE ONLY INVERT ERROR AMONG THE SPECIAL PRINTINGS.
Although the 1c Post Office stamps were printed from a 200-subject plate, the sheets were divided into panes of 100 before overprinting. Therefore, only 100 of the inverted "Specimen" overprints could have been produced, and we do not know how many were sold. Only a small fraction of the number printed has been located. (Image)
VERY FINE EXAMPLE OF THE RARE INVERTED "SPECIMEN" OVERPRINT ON THE ONE-CENT POST OFFICE SPECIAL PRINTING. THIS IS THE ONLY INVERT ERROR AMONG THE SPECIAL PRINTINGS.
Although the 1c Post Office stamps were printed fro a 200-subject plate, the sheets were divided into panes of 100 before overprinting. Therefore, only 100 of the inverted "Specimen" overprints could have been produced, and we do not know how many were sold. Only a small fraction of the number printed has been located. (Image)
FINE. A SOUND AND UNUSUALLY PRISTINE EXAMPLE OF THE ONE-CENT POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT "SEPCIMEN" ERROR.
With a sold quantity of 6,015, it is possible that 60 "Sepcimen" errors were released, but we do not know how the sheets were divided and sold, nor do we know if the entire print run had the error in Position 21. Reports of known examples are fewer than a dozen. This example is sound and much fresher than most we have seen. (Image)
FINE. A RARE EXAMPLE OF THE ONE-CENT POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT "SEPCIMEN" ERROR.
With a sold quantity of 6,015, it is possible that 60 "Sepcimen" errors were released, but we do not know how the sheets were divided and sold, nor do we know if the entire print run had the error in Position 21. Reports of known examples are fewer than a dozen.
Ex Lewenthal and Kharash (Image)
THE ONLY RECORDED EXAMPLE OF THE 3-CENT POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT SPECIAL PRINTING WITH "SEPCIMEN" ERROR. ONE OF THE GREAT RARITIES OF SPECIAL PRINTINGS.
Only 91 copies of the 3c Post Office Special Printing were sold. Assuming that one sheet was divided and sold before starting on the next sequential sheet (we do not know if that, in fact, was the practice), then no more than one 3c Post Office "Sepcimen" error (Position 21) was sold. According to Combs, the existence of a 3c Post Office "Sepcimen" was reported by Konwiser in 1925 (see page 40 of Combs booklet), but it was not listed in the Scott Catalogue until 1971, two years after it was certified by Herbert Bloch of the Friedl Expert Committee.
With 1969 Friedl certificate. (Image)